The Phoenix News makes some interesting points about the recent Google uproar on Capital Hill.
From their public testimony, at least, some Internet companies working in China indicated they are genuinely conflicted about their roles. Not surprisingly, though, they ultimately concluded that conducting business is a better option than withdrawal.
Google vice-president Elliot Schrage was honest enough to acknowledge that “there is no question that, as a matter of business, we want to be active in China. It is a huge, rapidly growing, and enormous market.”
“The requirements of doing business in China include self-censorship, something that runs counter to Google’s most basic values and commitments as a company,” Schrage continued in his testimony.
“Our decision was based on a judgment that Google.cn will make a meaningful — though imperfect — contribution to the overall access of information in China.” In order to bolster his company’s contention that its services were beneficial on “human rights and freedom of expression” grounds, Microsoft associate general counsel Jack Krumholtz cited a survey in which 60 percent of Chinese Internet users said that they believed the Internet would allow them more opportunities to criticize the government.
To read more:
http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid6072.aspx
Recent Comments